Sepsis management appears in nearly every NBME shelf, Step 2 CK block, and Step 3 simulation. Early recognition and structured decision-making consistently predict success on patient-centered items. This guide presents a high-yield, evidence-based sepsis step-by-step management algorithm designed specifically for test-day pattern recognition. Within the first 100 words you’ll also see how the algorithm informs critical decisions such as when to give fluids, when to start vasopressors, when to pursue source control, and how to avoid common USMLE traps such as ordering lactate too late or delaying antibiotics for imaging. The exams repeatedly test your ability to stabilize the patient first, prioritize perfusion, and transition smoothly from diagnosis to treatment. That sequence—recognize → resuscitate → isolate source → escalate care—mirrors the algorithm we use clinically. When examinees struggle, it is usually due to skipping an early stabilizing step or placing diagnostics ahead of therapy. Throughout this article, the algorithm is broken into digestible chunks that mirror the exam’s vignette pacing. Sepsis vignettes also integrate multi-system pathology such as pneumonia, pyelonephritis, meningitis, biliary infection, postpartum infections, device-associated infections, and occult abdominal pathology. To prepare you for these variations, each section builds the underlying logic that NBME items expect you to recognize. You’ll also see where Step 3 introduces additional layers like volume assessment via bedside ultrasound or the need for timely vasopressors in distributive shock. When you synthesize the algorithm with repeated retrieval (especially using adaptive QBank formats like the 9,000-question MDSteps bank), you train the exact decision pathways tested on the boards. The goal is not memorization but reproducible reasoning. The algorithm we present is fully guideline-aligned and optimized for exam thinking, focusing on immediately actionable steps. Early recognition is the cornerstone of the entire management pathway. The exams assume you can detect sepsis even before a lactate value or culture result returns. Vignettes typically reveal a constellation of findings—fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, hypotension, AMS, or oliguria. While SIRS criteria are no longer used diagnostically in clinical practice, the NBME still tests the physiological patterns because they signal systemic inflammation. The actual exam standard aligns more closely with identifying suspected infection plus organ dysfunction, such as confusion, hypoxemia, rising creatinine, or elevated bilirubin. The first mistake students make is waiting for “classic” fever or leukocytosis. In Step 2 CK and Step 3 vignettes, elderly, immunocompromised, and postoperative patients may present with only mild tachypnea or a subtle change in mental status. Recognizing these soft signs is essential because your earliest intervention—fluids and empiric antibiotics—will hinge on your ability to detect sepsis promptly. In shock-level presentations (SBP < 90, MAP < 65, cold extremities, mottled skin, elevated lactate), the exam expects immediate action. Waiting for a culture result or imaging delays care and leads to incorrect answer choices. Even something as seemingly benign as ordering a CT scan before stabilizing hemodynamics is penalized on high-stakes items. Although qSOFA is often mentioned, exam questions rarely require formally calculating it. Instead, they embed the criteria—altered mental status, fast respiratory rate, low systolic blood pressure—into the stem. The moment you detect these features, your priority becomes stabilization, not diagnostic classification. To solidify recognition, let’s look at the hallmark “immediate-action” triggers that should automatically pivot you toward sepsis management on Step 2 CK and Step 3: Recognizing sepsis rapidly positions you to execute the remaining algorithm steps with precision, which is exactly what the NBME tests. The next step, stabilization, determines whether the patient reverses organ dysfunction early. Once sepsis is recognized, stabilization becomes the immediate priority. Step 2 CK and Step 3 repeatedly reward learners who initiate stabilization even before labs return. The ABC hierarchy must be applied consistently. The exam expects you to determine whether airway protection is needed due to altered mental status or respiratory failure. Signs such as inability to maintain oxygenation, accessory muscle use, or PaO₂ below expected range often signal the need for early intubation. In the breathing phase, supplemental oxygen is indicated for all septic patients until SpO₂ is reliably above 94%. Non-invasive ventilation is an option for certain respiratory conditions but is usually not the correct answer when sepsis is accompanied by hypotension, altered mental status, or multi-organ dysfunction. The exam emphasizes early airway control in these high-risk scenarios. Circulatory stabilization begins with rapid IV access—preferably two large-bore IV lines. If peripheral access fails, intraosseous access is acceptable in emergency settings. Administering 30 mL/kg of balanced crystalloids is a cornerstone guideline intervention that consistently appears in exam content. The most common distractor is giving too little fluid or delaying fluids to wait for imaging or lab confirmation. When fluids alone do not correct hypotension (MAP remains < 65), the algorithm moves immediately to starting vasopressors. Norepinephrine is the first-line agent. The exam tests this repeatedly. Delaying vasopressors, choosing dopamine instead, or ordering additional diagnostics before correcting perfusion leads to incorrect answers. While stabilizing, do not delay antibiotic administration. Even if blood cultures are pending, the correct answer is to give broad-spectrum antibiotics within the first hour. This timing appears frequently in Step 2 CK and Step 3 knowledge items and CCS cases. Practice exactly how you’ll be tested—adaptive QBank, live CCS, and clarity from your data. The exam prioritizes management over diagnostics. That principle shapes the laboratory approach for septic patients. You should always order your essential labs quickly, but never at the expense of delaying fluids or antibiotics. In Step 2 CK and Step 3, the correct sequence nearly always resembles this: start fluids → give antibiotics → then interpret labs. Blood cultures are essential and should be drawn before antibiotics when feasible. However, if the patient is in shock or hard to access, giving antibiotics before cultures is preferred over delaying treatment. The exam emphasizes that failure to administer antibiotics promptly leads to increased mortality. Additionally, a lactate level is crucial. Lactate is both a diagnostic and prognostic marker, and its trends guide resuscitation progress. Repeat lactate assessment within hours is often tested in Step 3 CCS cases where you monitor response to therapy. Renal function (creatinine), liver enzymes, complete blood count, coagulation profile, and ABGs are standard. Exam vignettes often embed clues such as thrombocytopenia or elevated bilirubin to prompt suspicion for organ dysfunction. Recognizing these clues reinforces timely intervention. Importantly, the exam does not require exotic biomarkers like procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis. Although useful clinically, NBME items rarely hinge on this test. For Step 3 CCS, additional attention is placed on urine output monitoring. The exam expects hourly tracking with a goal of ≥ 0.5 mL/kg/h. Failure to monitor urine output is penalized in scoring because it reflects poor understanding of renal perfusion assessment. Prompt antibiotic administration is the single most time-sensitive therapeutic intervention tested across Step 2 CK and Step 3. Several randomized studies link delays to worsened outcomes, and the exam mirrors this evidence. The NBME frequently provides distractor choices such as ordering a CT scan before giving antibiotics or waiting for a source-specific culture result. These are traps. In all but the most unusual cases, antibiotics precede imaging. Empiric coverage depends on suspected source. For example, pneumonia vignettes often require ceftriaxone plus azithromycin, whereas urinary infections require cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam for severe cases. In hospital-acquired infections, broader coverage including anti-pseudomonal agents is typically needed. Immunocompromised patients often require even broader initial therapy. When meningitis is suspected, especially in patients with altered mental status, antibiotics and steroids must be administered immediately—again, before imaging unless there's a strong contraindication to LP. This timing reflects the core exam expectation that stabilization and treatment supersede diagnostics. Once cultures return, narrowing therapy is usually an exam-tested concept. For example, narrowing coverage for MSSA from vancomycin to nafcillin is a commonly tested principle. Step 3 may incorporate stewardship concepts where narrowing or transitioning to oral therapy is part of good care, but Step 2 CK focuses more on early empiric choices. If you're using the MDSteps Adaptive QBank, the system automatically generates flashcards from your missed antimicrobial questions, helping you internalize empiric regimens for future blocks. This integrated reinforcement is helpful when differentiating coverage patterns under test-day pressure. In distributive shock, fluids alone are often insufficient. Exam vignettes frequently present patients who remain hypotensive after a 30 mL/kg bolus. The USMLE expects you to proceed directly to vasopressors—usually norepinephrine. This choice is important because dopamine, while sometimes used clinically in select scenarios, is almost always an incorrect exam answer due to arrhythmia risk and lack of mortality benefit. Vasopressors require adequate intravascular volume to be effective. Placing a central line is helpful for stable infusion, but the exam does not require you to delay initiation until the central line is placed. Starting norepinephrine through a peripheral line is acceptable in a resuscitation context on Step 3 CCS. The target MAP is ≥ 65 mm Hg. This cutoff appears on nearly every sepsis management question. Exam items often add nuance by presenting borderline MAP values or patients with rising lactate despite stable blood pressure. These are signals that vasopressor support may be appropriate earlier in the course. Epinephrine is typically a second-line agent. Vasopressin is sometimes added to reduce norepinephrine requirements. Phenylephrine rarely appears as an initial choice unless there are specific contraindications to other agents. Recognizing when to escalate from fluids to vasopressors is an essential skill for Step 2 CK and Step 3, reflecting real-world physiology in distributive shock. Progressively tailoring support based on lactate clearance, urine output, and mental status is the hallmark of effective sepsis management. Source control is the final cornerstone of the sepsis algorithm. The exam tests this concept heavily in abdominal, pelvic, and soft tissue infections. When a patient fails to improve after appropriate fluids, antibiotics, and pressors, the next step often involves imaging to locate abscesses, obstructions, or necrotic tissue. For example, undrained intraabdominal abscesses require interventional radiology drainage. Obstructed urinary systems need decompression through nephrostomy or stenting. Soft-tissue infections like necrotizing fasciitis require surgical debridement. These principles appear routinely on Step 2 CK and Step 3 and are among the highest-yield concepts in sepsis-related questions. When evaluating for source control, the exam expects you to prioritize stabilization over imaging. Avoid choosing CT scans before completing initial resuscitation steps. The NBME frames vignettes to see whether you understand that imaging is important but not urgent compared to restoring perfusion. Sepsis progression after early therapy often signals a hidden source. Recognizing this progression and intervening appropriately is essential for exam success. If you want to practice this algorithm under exam-like pressure, the MDSteps Adaptive QBank (9,000+ questions) and Step 3 CCS Live Vitals Cases allow you to rehearse fluid timing, pressor initiation, and real-time management decisions with immediate feedback. These tools reinforce pattern recognition, which is vital for mastery. Medically reviewed by: Jordan Patel, MD — Internal Medicine & Critical CareWhy Sepsis Algorithms Matter for Step Exams
Exam Skill
What NBME Tests
Recognition
SIRS signs, hypotension, organ dysfunction, elevated lactate
Stabilization
Airway, oxygen, IV access, fluids before labs return
Management
Antibiotics within 1 hour, 30 mL/kg fluids, early vasopressors
Follow-up
Reassess lactate, urine output, MAP ≥ 65
Step 1 of the Algorithm: Recognize Sepsis Early
Step 2 of the Algorithm: Stabilize Airway, Breathing, and Circulation
Intervention
When to Perform
Oxygen delivery
Immediately if SpO₂ < 94% or increased WOB
IV access
Immediately; two large-bore lines preferred
Crystalloid bolus
30 mL/kg for hypotension or lactate ≥ 4
Vasopressors
Initiate if MAP < 65 after fluids
Master your USMLE prep with MDSteps.
100+ new students last month.
Step 3 of the Algorithm: Obtain Key Labs Without Delaying Treatment
Step 4 of the Algorithm: Administer Empiric Antibiotics Within the First Hour
Step 5 of the Algorithm: Initiate Vasopressors When Fluids Fail
Step 6 of the Algorithm: Identify and Control the Infection Source
Rapid-Review Checklist: Sepsis Algorithm Essentials
References
Algorithms & Diagnostics
Sepsis Made Simple: A Step-by-Step Management Algorithm for Step 2 CK & Step
Full Access - Free Trial - No Long Term Commitments
What you get
No Commitments • Free Trial • Cancel Anytime
Create your account
